In the video, Reicher and Haslam discuss their findings when they evaluate the Milgram experiments, which include that PEOPLE DO NOT OBEY AUTHORITY. This is what technocracy offers: eugenicsĪn important aspect of what narratives do to us is discussed in this video of Alison Morrow interviewing Steven Reicher and Alex Haslam. Huxley was outspoken in his view that the “white race” was indeed the most superior race of all and that the “black race” was amongst the most inferior.” This also appertained to what were considered to be the “lower” races, to which, T.H. He acknowledges that such measures may appear immoral, but that it is only immoral when coercion is used against persons of “normal intelligence,” for those who are deemed abnormal, unable to use reason, such standards of morality do not apply. Thus, those in possession of such unwanted qualities should be segregated from society or sterilised. etc.) were all to be considered heritable qualities. He claims that mental defectiveness (which ranged from criminal behaviour, insanity, physical deformities and forms of mental retardation to addictions such as alcoholism and gambling, homelessness, owing massive debt etc. He goes on to state that modern society has too long tolerated the proliferation of the feeble minded and so creates an ever-lasting burden for itself. In his book, Leonard discusses how modern-day science is only to look at the interdependence of body and mind, that the existence of the soul has been discredited by modern science, and thus that conditions for improvement on the human condition must solely rely upon the social and biological. Huxley’s views and that of Charles Darwin. Leonard also wrote favourably of his father T.H. Wells and Leonard’s son Julian were outspoken avid supporters of. “Leonard Huxley published in 1926 his “Progress and the Unfit,” which was subsequently used to promote the Eugenics movement, to which H.G. Technocracy is, by design, born from the latter and has nothing to offer to anyone who lives in the real world. The latter usage does not express something empirically real. It is a mode of thinking we can use to either research something real we observe or we can use it as a closed mental system within ourselves. Math’s ,at best, just a tool to precisely express aspects of nature. We can craft “beautiful” realms of Platonic ideas in our minds and then look around and see how they are not valid at all. The technocratic dream of delivering the formula by which all can be controlled and subdued is not actually possible. Most of all, the narrative of a world of “mathematical attraction” is a theory that is naturally dispelled. If you ever read Yevgeny Zamyatin, you’ll see exactly how functional and attractive a society like that would be. Technocracy is trying to reduce humanity to what Heisenberg called “mathematics that, somehow detached from the physical world, seems to function by itself”.
0 kommentar(er)
